Reduction
of Microbial Air Pollution
in a Dental Clinic By Ionization
Negative air ionization
has the potential to reduce the concentration of airborne microorganisms.
The effect appears to result from the ionization of bioaerosols and dust
particles that may carry microorganisms, causing them to settle out more
rapidly. Settling tends to occur on horizontal surfaces, especially metallic
surfaces, and generally in the area near the ionization unit. Ionization
may enhance agglomeration, creating larger particles out of smaller particles,
thereby increasing the settling rate. Ionization may also cause attraction
between ionized particles and grounded surfaces.
In situations where
dust may carry microorganisms, negative air ionization can be economical
to use to reduce infections. It has been used economically to reduce
the incidence of Newcastle Disease Virus in poultry houses (Mitchell
1994). Poultry houses can be notoriously dusty.
The above chart shows
the Colony Forming Units (CFU) measured with and without ionization in
a dental clinic by Gabbay et al (1990). Airborne microbial levels were
reduced by 32-52% with ionization. He also found that horizontal plates
picked up considerably more cultures than vertical plates, strongly suggesting
that settling out of ionized particles was the primary mode of removal.
This chart summarizes
the results of studies by Makela et al (1979), who found that bacterial
aerosols in patient rooms of a burns and plastic surgery unit could be
reduced with air ionization. Variations in the bacterial levels were
associated with bed-changing and other room activities. The humidity
in the rooms was low, which may have enhanced the effect.
In this chart, also
based on results from Makela et al (1979), specifically identified Staphylococcus
aureus levels in a room with and without ionization. The average
for two days of monitoring indicated a definitive reduction in airborne
levels. Staphylococcus aureus is a potential nosocomial infectious
agent of wounds and burns.
The chart above summarizes
some results from Happ et al (1966), who found that levels of aerosolized
virus T1 bacteriophage were reduced under various types of ionization,
which included mixed ions, negative ions and positive ions. All three
types of ionization had comparable results in terms of reducing airborne
levels. The method used by Happ involved testing the filtration efficiency,
in which lower filter efficiencies demonstrated lower recoveries from
the air. These lower recoveries suggested either that the phage was not
present in the air or had perhaps been inactivated.
TYPICAL
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ION GENERATORS
Ion
Generation Method
Pulse
Ionization Field
Power
Supply
9
kV - 15 kV
Wattage
0.75
- 2.7 W
Ozone
Production
< 0.02
PPM
References
Gabbay, J. (1990). Effect
of ionization on microbial air pollution in the dental clinic. Environ.
Res. 52(1): 99.
Happ, J. W., J. B.
Harstad, et al. (1966). Effect of air ions on submicron T1 bacteriophage
aerosols. Appl. Microb. 14: 888-891.
ICCCS (1992). The
Future Practice of Contamination Control. Proceedings of the 11th International
Symposium on Contamination Control, Westminster, Mechanical Engineering
Publications.
Mitchell, B. W. a.
D. J. K. (1994). Effect of negative air ionization on airborne
transmission of newcastle disease virus. Avian Diseases 38: 725-732.
Mitchell, B. W. (1994). Effect
of negative air ionization on airborne transmission of Newcastle Disease
Virus. Avian Dis. 38(4): 725.
Phillips, G., G.
J. Harris, et al. (1963). The effect of ions on microorganisms. Int.
J. Biometerol. 8: 27-37.
Estola, T., P. Makela,
et al. (1979). "The effect of air ionization on the air-borne
transmission of experimental Newcastle disease virus infections in
chickens." J. Hyg. 83: 59-67.
Kreuger, A. P., R.
F. Smith, et al. (1957). "The action of air ions on bacteria." J.
Gen. Physiol. 41: 359-381.
Krueger, A. P. and
E. J. Reed (1976). "Biological Impact of Small Air Ions." Science
193(Sep): 1209-1213.
Lehtimaki, M. and
G. Graeffe (1976). The effect of the ionization of air on aerosols
in closed spaces. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on
Contamination Control, Copenhagen.
Makela, P., J. Ojajarvi,
et al. (1979). "Studies on the effects of ionization on bacterial
aerosols in a burns and plastic surgery unit." J. Hyg. 83: 199-206.
Phillips, G., G.
J. Harris, et al. (1964). "Effect of air ions on bacterial aerosols." Intl.
J. of Biometerol. 8: 27-37.
Soyka, F. & A.
Edmonds (1991). "The Ion Effect" Bantam Books.
(Many thanks to the
people at Electrocorp for providing some of the above information and
support for the ongoing studies of negative air ionization at PSU.)
Source: Aerobiological Engineering,
Pennsylvania State University
Find the Right Air Purifier for
Your Unique Problem
or Application
It's no mystery that the air inside our homes, offices and nearly every building
we enter is contaminated with
toxic air pollution problems. But wading through the plethora of air purification
technologies and models to make our living and working space free of pollution
can be a daunting task, especially with the misinformation presented by so
many salespeople and web sites. There are many different air purification technologies
and air filters on the market, but no one air purifier technology can solve
every air pollution problem, which is why we carry different brands. For help
determining which air purifier is right for you, click on one of the below
links or call us toll free at 866-875-4386 (US and Canada).