Buy More, Save Money on Brazil and True
Blue Coral Calcium
Calcium Supplements
Calcium Forms, Bioavailability
Subject of Industry Discussion
by Kurt Schneider
Calcium is returning to the forefront of the dietary supplement
industry. Much of the recent publicity has centered on coral calcium,
including supplier claims of higher absorptivity and bioavailability.
Coral calcium can be considered 'young' calcium carbonate ore, which
is an economical, pure and widely available source of calcium.
Calcium is a mineral often taken for granted in our diets,
usually consisting of a daily dose of a multi-vitamin or a calcium supplement.
Despite supplementation, osteoporosis--or bone density loss--remains
prevalent. The human body needs a source of calcium that can be absorbed
at a level effective in fighting osteoporosis. To do so, there are many
forms of calcium currently available, such as calcium carbonate, calcium
citrate, calcium gluconate, oyster shell, scallop shell, eggshell, milk
products and, the latest, coral calcium. While there has been much debate
over which type is best, it is clear that whatever form is taken, it
needs to be absorbed by the body to provide any benefit.
As calcium is ingested, the acid in the stomach begins
to breakdown the molecule into its atomic components. In the case of
calcium carbonate, the components are elemental calcium and carbonic
acid, which further breaks down into carbon dioxide. At this point the
calcium is in its ionic, or positively charged, state. In this state,
the calcium can pass through the intestinal tract, into the bloodstream,
and into the bones. It is this rate of calcium absorption, or bioavailability,
that determines how much of the ingested calcium actually can be used
by the body. The higher the bioavailability, the more calcium ions can
travel into the body. In addition, the faster the supplement can obtain
this ionic state, the faster it becomes available for absorption. Since
time is critical, it is important to ensure as much calcium is absorbed
before it passes through the body. Studies have shown that as long as
the body absorbs enough calcium, the rate of absorption is not indicative
of the quality of the calcium. The bioavailability or absorption and
uptake of calcium are partly a function of pH. Acidity favors absorption
while alkalinity hinders absorption. An increase in acidophilic flora
(i.e., L. acidophilus) in the intestine favors calcium absorption.1 With
normal gastric function, almost all calcium forms become soluble and
bioavailable. Further, studies have shown that solubility of calcium
forms does not significantly affect absorption.2 Calcium carbonate
is not soluble in water; it is soluble in acid and is well-absorbed in
normal gastric function.
Levels of calcium in various products also vary. Calcium
percentages range from 9 percent for calcium gluconate to nearly 40 percent
for calcium carbonate.3 It would appear that the higher starting
level of calcium would provide better absorption and bioavailability;
this is not necessarily the case. As the supplement passes through the
body, studies have shown there is little difference in bioavailability
between all major types of calcium. When taken with meals, calcium carbonate
has been shown to be as or more absorbable (39%) as five other forms
of calcium, including calcium acetate (32%), calcium lactate (32%), milk
(31%), calcium citrate (30%) and calcium gluconate (27%).4
There are other factors that play a role in how well the
body absorbs calcium.
"Nutrients in foods interact with each other, and the absorption
of any nutrient depends, in part, upon the foods that are eaten with
it and the nutrients and other substances those foods contain,"
wrote Suzanne Havala, M.S., R.D., in the Vegetarian Journal.
"It also depends upon the body's need for the particular nutrient.
Our bodies can adapt to varying dietary conditions; when we need more
of many nutrients, the body may compensate and become more efficient
at absorbing them."5
Even similar forms of calcium may come from different sources.
For example, calcium carbonate can come from a variety of fossilized
deposit sources: limestone, precipitated limestone, oyster shell, scallop
shell, eggshell, fish bones and coral. According to geologist Jose N.
Peralta Villar, the age of the deposit is the only major difference between
the sources.6" Some deposits were literally formed yesterday
such as those oyster shells, scallops and corals currently living and
dying now, adding to the topmost layer of newly forming deposits. Others
are millions of years old. Recent deposits are subjected to all elements
in the surrounding water, and, with the state of the rivers and oceanic
margins becoming more polluted, it may be wise to find a calcium carbonate
source that is from a high quality mine, further inland, that is much
less susceptible to environmental pollutants. A reef, for example, is
made up almost exclusively of animals that use dissolved calcium carbonate
in the water to make either an internal or external calcium carbonate
structure. As time goes on, the deposit accumulates to various levels.
Some deposits are thousands of feet thick while others are just a few.
It all depends on the initial environment and time."
The majority of the coral calcium products sold in the
United States is made of calcium carbonate from coral reefs, which, apart
from age, is no different than calcium carbonate from other sources such
as limestone. Some studies have even stated the claimed benefits of coral
calcium are derived from a separate compound found in the water, calcium
aspartate, and not the coral itself.
If all calcium carbonate sources are basically the same
in regard to source and bioavailability, what is the best way for manufacturers
to choose a source? Five criteria should be considered: grade, lead level,
quality, color and cost. For grade, there are basically just two--food
and pharmaceutical--with numerous permutations. For lead level, California
Proposition 65 has set the standard for dietary supplement lead intake,
and has had a great impact on the calcium carbonate industry. Tablet
manufacturers are requiring lower lead levels, with some sources moving
into the low parts per billion range. Basically, the lower the lead level,
the more options for formulation.
Quality of the material has come under scrutiny lately.
Besides ensuring the material meets all chemical specifications (including
lead), a manufacturer needs to pay close attention to the microbiological
activity of the material. Laboratory tests conducted by Silliker Laboratories
in Carson, Calif., for Nutri Granulations showed micro counts as high
as 31,000 APC in some coral samples. With a USP standard specification
of less than 3,000 APC, diligence in raw material testing is critical.
Color has also become an important criterion for tableting companies.
The whiter the source material, the more formulation options for visual
appeal of the tablet. Finally, costs of powdered calcium carbonate can
range from less than $0.10/kg to more than $30/kg based primarily on
source.
Overall, selecting a calcium carbonate raw material depends
on how it meets the manufacturer's needs. Given the similarities of the
various sources, as well as similar bioavailability levels, it is apparent
that the end benefits for the consumer are the same, regardless of the
origin of the calcium.
Kurt C. Schneider, general manager of La Mirada, Calif.-based
Nutri Granulations, has a 16-year career in foods, nutritional foods,
and dietary supplements. He currently specializes in granulation technologies
of calcium-based products.
References
Harper's Review of Biochemistry, 17th ed., p. 575-6,
1979; Normal and Therapeutic Nutrition, 14th ed., p. 105-6, 1972.
Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, p. 151, 1994.
Sheikh MS et al. "Gastrointestinal absorption
of calcium from milk and calcium salts."
NEJM, 317, 9:532-6, 1987.
ibid.
Havala S,
"Calcium content in tahini."
Vegetarian Journal, July/August 1996.