Articles That Support Self-Awareness
and Personal Growth
Pity God, for He Is Beyond Salvation
(Arlo R. Hansen 9/18/99)
There are some who will scream,
"Blasphemy!" upon reading the title of this essay, because
the idea of mankind
"pitying God" for any reason will not rest easy with them.
So be it.
Taken literally, the statement is in fact blasphemous, for the idea
it conveys is that God needs to be saved, which is ridiculous if one
accepts as true the premise that God is Omni-everything. So, by saying
God is beyond salvation, do I mean He has sunk so low that He cannot
possibly be redeemed and, therefore, deserves our pity? Of course not.
The meaning here is that since God is beyond (not a candidate for) salvation,
He has nothing to look forward to, and that is a pitiful state.
Omni-everything is another way of saying infinite. Infinite is a word
conceived by a finite mind to mean (among other things) without beginning
or end, i.e., everlasting. To this writer's finite mind, an Infinite
Being, existing as past, present, and future, without shape or boundary,
being All and, therefore, knowing no-thing, would be everlastingly boring
and a great pity.
But, can infinity be known by finite minds? Can it even be accurately
defined by finite minds? Are the definitions of infinity created by finite
minds nothing more than speculation? Not being infinite, how can finite
minds know what infinity is? Is infinity a reality, or just a concept
of finite minds?
The answer to the first question is, no. The finite mind cannot readily
accept the idea of something having no beginning or ending. However,
if the finite mind can get past this hurdle, then it must take into account
that time is contained within infinity, not vice-versa. This means that
what was, is, and will be, always were, are; and have been; therefore,
creation was finished before it began! Unacceptable!
An accurate definition of infinity must deal with space, which, by definition,
must also be contained within infinity. If there were no objects, infinity
would be nothing but emptiness, as it would be no one (particular) thing,
unless emptiness is a thing, which it is not, because emptiness is nothing
(no-thing). There are things, however, so we can dismiss the idea of
infinity as being only space, for if it were only space, it would mean
infinity was nothing; therefore, there would be no place for it not to
be at!
So, both space and things are contained in infinity. Things have to
be somewhere, so they are in space. If space were something, things in
it would displace space from their locations, thereby raising spaces
height the same way you may raise the height of water in a bucket by
placing stones in the bucket. Things need space between them so they
may be perceived as "things."
Space needs "things" in it in order to be perceived as "space." So,
which came first? Like the chicken and the egg, they came together, i.e.,
at the same time, because you cannot have one without the other.
To finite mind, infinity cannot know what it is, because it has to have
boundaries to make it possible for it to define itself; therefore, infinity,
to learn what it is, must become finite (things). How can infinity accomplish
this not knowing what it is? And, if it knows what it is, it is not INFINITY,
NOR CAN IT REMEMBER THAT IT EVER WAS! It very much appears that infinity
exists only as a speculation of the finite mind created for the specific
purpose of attempting to explain what is (existence). So, lets
go bark up another tree.
I am aware that I am aware. If I were just aware without knowing I was
aware, I would not be self-aware. If I were not self-aware, but just
aware, would I not then be infinite awareness? Neither science nor religion
can explain the mystery of being. Whatever caused it caused it because
it wanted to. Moreover, there is no necessity for us to know, because
knowing would not change our present status as named, living, physical
bodies with properly recorded birth dates and eventual, certain death
dates!
So, what do we do in the interim? Whatever we want! What dont
we do in the interim? Whatever we dont want! The Original created
a macro that constantly repeats.