Fluoride Conference Reveals Fraudulent
Science Behind Mass Fluoridation; Fluoride Policy Is a Public Fraud
Posted Aug 8, 2004 PT by the Health Ranger (Mike
Adams)
The First Citizens' Conference on Fluoride was recently held in Canton,
New York, and it revealed some astonishing new research about the dangers
of fluoride and why the current political position on fluoridation of
public water supplies is based on fraudulent science.
The fluoridation of public water is something that has been highly debated
for decades -- and yet the practice continues today, despite the growing
body of evidence showing that fluoridation causes untold human suffering
and disease. Some of the research presented at the conference showed,
for example, that fluoridation damages the brain, increases levels of
lead in children's blood and therefore leads to behavioral disorders
and brain damage. It also showed that humans are accumulating fluoride
in their bones, that fluoride's toxicity is systemic in the human body,
and that the current safe drinking water standards for fluoride were
fraudulently authored by officials at the Environmental Protection Agency
who were pressured.
These findings were presented by a variety of scientists and researchers,
including a senior EPA scientist and a doctor of the Forsyth Dental Center.
Not surprisingly, both of these individuals have been fired and have
had their careers jeopardized after participating in this conference.
One of the more interesting bits of evidence presented in the study
was an internal memo issued by the EPA professional who wrote the current
fluoridation safe drinking water standards. In the memo, the official
notes how this new standard would produce "teeth gross enough to
gag a maggot." The conference also featured author Christopher Bryson,
who wrote the book The Fluoride Deception, who said, "Fluoride science
is corporate science, fluoride science is DDT science, it's asbestos
science, it's tobacco science."
In other words, fluoride science isn't scientific at all -- it's distorted
science made up by bureaucrats and political officials who have some
other agenda in mind rather than public health. If you're new to this
debate on fluoride, you might find some of this information shocking.
But I've been covering fluoride for several years, and have fought hard
at both the local and national level to educate people about the dangers
of fluoridation.
There are so many things wrong with the mass fluoridation of the U.S.
population that it's hard to know where to begin talking about it. First
off, there's the idea that fluoride is a so-called "naturally occurring
substance in water." That's the lie propagated by dentists and the
American Dental Association to try to convince people that simply "adjusting
the naturally occurring levels" is somehow a good thing to do.
But all of this is based on a distortion. In reality, the fluoride added
to the public water supplies in the United States is not organic fluoride
at all. It is in fact fluorosilicic acid, which is purchased in bulk
from chemical companies, who must be laughing loudly at the idea that
they can actually sell this toxic waste product. Why? Because if cities
weren't buying it and putting it into the public water supply, these
industrial companies would have to spend millions of dollars disposing
of fluorosilicic acid because it is an EPA regulated toxic waste.
Let me put this another way -- fluorosilicic acid is a toxic waste byproduct
that is produced in the United States by various chemical companies.
It represents such a health hazard to human beings that it is regulated
by the EPA, and must be disposed of as a toxic waste. And yet, municipalities
throughout the United States actually purchase this product and then
drip it into the public water supply, and simultaneously call it "fluoride."
Fluorosilicic acid is not fluoride, it is something very different,
and it strikes me as downright bizarre that it is perfectly legal to
dump this toxic waste product into the rivers and streams of America
as long as it passes through the bodies of human beings first. In other
words, it's illegal to take a bucket of fluorosilicic acid and dump it
into a stream, but it is perfectly legal to dump it into the bodies of
human beings, whose waste products will subsequently enter those same
streams and rivers.
All of this is done under the guise of distorted scientific evidence
that claims the mass consumption of fluorosilicic acid somehow improves
the dental health of Americans. And yet there is no credible evidence
that this is the case. All of the evidence cited by the EPA, the American
Dental Association, and dentists has been fraudulently concocted, and
quite frankly is decades old.
Across America today, you see the effects of mass fluoridation all around
you -- you see children with darkened teeth from fluoridosis, you see
elderly people breaking their bones because fluoridation of the water
supplies contributes to brittle bones. You see children with behavioral
disorders that are multiplied by the effects of lead in their bloodstream,
and lead uptake is enhanced in the presence of fluoride in public water.
You also see a great number of neurological disorders in the U.S. population.
You see problems with migraine headaches, clinical depression, dementia,
and Alzheimer's, and there is a very strong link between these diseases
and the long-term consumption of fluoride in the public water supply.
Beyond all of this, there's the important question of why dentists and
public health officials think the public water supply is an acceptable
medium through which to mass medicate the U.S. population in the first
place. It is a forced medication that has no consideration for the nutritional
choices made by individuals who might be drinking that water. Some individuals
might be using fluoridated toothpaste, and thus if they're drinking fluoridated
water, they could easily be getting too much fluoride and suffer from
fluoridosis.
The public water supply is a bad place to be putting drugs and medications
in an effort to alter the chemistry of the U.S. population. I've even
heard some doctors who are excited about the supposed benefits of statin
drugs say that we should drip statin drugs into the public water supply
the way we do fluoride. They say the benefit is so widespread that everybody
should be taking these drugs. It would be ludicrous to suppose that we
should mass-medicate the entire U.S. public with statin drugs by dripping
them into the public water supply, and yet this is exactly what takes
place every day right now with fluoride, which is also a bioactive chemical
compound that could reasonably be classified as a drug. Using the public
water supply to mass medicate people is bad policy. It's also bad science,
and it takes away the freedom of choice from the U.S. population. It
is Big Brother at its worst.
One of the other things I find so interesting about this debate on fluoride
is that dentists and doctors will leap to defend this practice at every
opportunity -- and why? Is it because there's good scientific evidence
that fluoridination is somehow beneficial to the public? No, it's because
they've been told to support it by their associations, such as the American
Medical Association and the American Dental Association.
In community meetings, I've seen local dentists jump up and down and
scream about how important fluoridation is for public health. These people
use their apparent authority to try to convince everyone that they should
be mass medicated with this substance. I find this especially bizarre
because many of these dentists and doctors promote this as a nutritional
prevention strategy -- they're talking about fluoride as being essential
nutrition (see related ebook on nutrition) for the human body, and therefore
we should put it into the water supply. And yet, if you mention that
the most common nutritional deficiencies are in fact magnesium, zinc,
vitamin D, and the B vitamins, they will look at you as if you are speaking
some kind of alien tongue. Apparently in their minds, there is only one
nutritional deficiency that exists in the world, and that is a fluoride
deficiency. All other nutritional deficiencies are called quackery, and
the idea of dripping zinc into the public water supply would be called
absurd by these doctors and dentists. And yet they are more than happy
to drip a toxic waste byproduct into the water supply, as long as it
is called a nutritional deficiency that needs to be overcome through
the forced mass medication of the entire population.
All of this is so bizarre that a reasonable person can only conclude
these doctors and dentists are operating on auto-pilot. They are parroting
whatever their organizing associations are telling them to say. They've
been sucked into the myth that fluoride is automatically good for everyone
and that every person in the country should be dosed with this bioactive
chemical compound.
And to top it off, they are extremely arrogant about the whole thing.
They act like because they are dentists, they are qualified to talk about
this one single nutritional deficiency and its effects on the entire
human body. In fact, dentists have no qualifications to talk about the
effects of fluoride on the human nervous system, the blood supply, behavioral
disorders or other physiological effects. Dentists are really only qualified
to talk about what's happening with your teeth -- not drugs or chemicals
that you ingest and that have a systemic effect.
At the same time, most western doctors aren't qualified to talk about
nutrition, either. They've had almost no nutritional training in their
medical schools, and simply remain illiterate about the relationships
between nutritional deficiencies and chronic disease. So, you essentially
have a whole group of experts that know nothing about the subject they
are talking about, but yet who grandstand and claim to be the authorities
on it and pound the public into the mistaken belief that people should
be dosed with this toxic waste product regardless of the scientific facts.
This is essentially a mass experiment now being conducted on the American
population, and I think we are seeing some the effects of this in the
worsening health statistics in this country. Fluoride is also thought
to suppress intelligence and independent will, which may explain some
of the reasons why the U.S. population is so easy to control through
propaganda and media manipulation. In fact, there is some interesting
research going way back about fluoride being used on wartime prisoners
as a truth serum in an effort to get them to go along with the capturing
nation's propaganda. So, in an almost comic sense, the mass medication
of the U.S. population with fluoride could, in a very real sense, be
turning our country into a nation of mindless zombies. Of course, that's
an exaggeration of what's probably really happening, but no doubt it
has some influence.
Now what does all of this mean for you, as consumer? What should you
do to protect yourself from fluoride? First off, you should never use
products that contain fluoride. That is, don't use toothpaste or mouthwashes
that contain fluoride. Also, don't purchase bottled water that has added
fluoride in it. I think that's a ridiculous product to have on the shelves.
Don't drink from the public water supply. Of course, if you're drinking
tap water right now, you probably need to step back and question your
judgment anyway -- tap water contains so many toxic chemicals (such as
chlorine) that it represents a risk to human health even without the
fluoride.