Fluoride Is Poison, Says Dartmouth
Doctor
New evidence seems to confirm that by fluoridating
our water,
we are
poisoning our children
By Tom Valentine
Now, a massive study of young children who have been subjected to fluorosilicic
acid fluoridation in their New York communities shows that the water
additive does not improve kids’ teeth and could even be poisoning them.
Until that time, most people were under the impression that water fluoridation
used sodium fluoride, rat poison, a by-product of aluminum manufacturing.
Glasser, however, pointed out that more than 75 percent of the U.S.
water fluoridation communities have been using the even more toxic fluorosilicic
acid since the late 1970s.
Glasser was the first to stress the excessive toxicity inherent in using
the hydrofluorosilicic acid residue that is removed from the industrial
pollution control “scrubbers” in the manufacture of phosphate fertilizers.
The chemists refer to this material as silicofluorides and have now
conclusively shown that the fluoridation material is linked to other
heavy metal toxins that are found in drinking water—lead, arsenic, aluminum
and cadmium for example.
In the March 2001 issue of the journal Neuro Toxicology, a team of researchers
led by Dr. Roger Masters of Dartmouth College reported evidence that
public drinking water fluoridated with fluorosilicic acid is linked to
higher levels of lead in children.
After pointing out that since 1992 only about 10 percent of America’s
fluoridated communities use sodium fluoride and 90 percent use fluorosilicic
acid, the researchers stated that about 140 million Americans have this
chemical placed in their water.
They also pointed out that sodium fluoride was tested on animals and
approved for human consumption, but fluorosilicic acid had not been so
tested and approved.
The research team studied the blood-lead levels in more than 400,000
children in three different samplings. In each case they found a significant
link between fluorosilicic acid-treated water and elevated blood levels
of lead.
In the latest study, the blood levels of about 150,000 children ranging
in ages from infant to 6 were analyzed.
The samples were collected by the New York State Department of Children’s
Health from 1994 through 1998.
Researchers concluded that the fluorosilicic acid-treated water was
equal to or worse a contributor of blood-lead levels as old house paint.
Dr. Masters said these preliminary findings correlate the fluorosilicic
acid water treatment and behavior problems that are due to known effects
of lead on brain chemistry.
Additionally, a study in Germany showed the fluorosilicic acid water
(SiFs) may inhibit the enzyme cholinesterase which plays a key role in
regulating neurotransmitters.
“If SiFs are cholinesterase inhibitors, this means that SiFs have effects
like the chemical agents linked to Gulf War Syndrome, chronic fatigue
syndrome and other puzzling conditions that plague millions of Americans,”
Masters said. “We need a better understanding of how SiFs behave chemically
and physiologically.”
Last March, Dr. Masters testified before New Hampshire legislators in
favor of the Fluoride Product Quality Control Act. The bill would put
the SiFs to a series of tests, and perhaps further research on neurotoxicity
and behavior.
“If further research confirms our findings,” Masters said, “this may
well be the worst environmental poison since leaded gasoline.”
The EPA admits it has no data on the health and behavioral effects of
SiFs.
Dr. Masters asked: “Shouldn’t we stop intentionally exposing 140 million
Americans to an untested chemical until the risks are extensively and
objectively evaluated by independent researchers?”
And, the final insult: There is no conclusive evidence that fluoridation
of drinking water significantly improves the teeth of children at all.