If you work near certain models of laser printers, you might be breathing
the same amount of ultra-fine particle pollution as if a smoker were
puffing away in the next cubicle, according to a study by Australian
scientists.
In one of the first studies of laser printers in a work setting, researchers
found that some models are sources of ultra-fine particles that contribute
to indoor air pollution. Breathing tiny particles can cause respiratory
irritation and more severe illnesses such as heart disease and cancer.
Almost half of the laser printers tested in the study emitted tiny particles
of toner-like material, sending out concentrations ranging from low to
high, according to the study findings published online today for the
American Chemical Society's journal Environmental Science and Technology.
The worst printers released amounts of ultra-fine particles rivaling
plumes of secondhand smoke. When inhaled, the particles -- tiny flecks
between 100 and 1,000 times smaller than the thickness of a human hair
-- can work their way deep into the lung, leading to heart and lung disease,
scientists say.
Laser printers in the study were manufactured by Hewlett-Packard, Toshiba,
Ricoh and Canon. All use toner, a powder used instead of ink.
Neither the state nor federal governments regulate indoor air pollution,
even though most people spend about 90 percent of their lives inside
buildings.
"If a printer operates in an indoor environment, the concentration
of ultra-fine particles would be of the same order of magnitude as if
there was secondhand smoke in a similar environment," said author
Lidia Morawska, director of the International Laboratory for Air Quality
and Health at Queensland University of Technology in an interview from
Brisbane.
"Even very small concentrations can be related to health hazards," she
said. "Where the concentrations are significantly elevated means
there is potentially a considerable hazard."
A worker's exposure level depends on the effectiveness of the building's
ventilation. The study also found that during work hours, printer use
caused indoor air pollution to increase fivefold.
Study results imply that "concentration levels in an office can
be reduced by a proper choice of printers," Morawska said.
Some printer manufacturers responded that their products meet safety
and health requirements. HP officials, for example, said they are reviewing
the study and have been conducting their own tests.
Morawska worked with fellow study authors, university colleague Congrong
He and Len Taplin of the Queensland Department of Public Works. The department
partially financed the study.
The researchers first went into a six-story office building in Brisbane
with the intent of testing the efficacy of the ventilation system. They
measured emissions from office equipment and found that the laser printers
put out the most ultra-fine particles.
The building had 62 laser printers. Of 42 different models found, 34
models were manufactured by HP, five by Ricoh, two by Toshiba and one
by Canon.
After testing all of the printers at a distance of about 2 feet, the
researchers divided them into four different categories. Twenty-three
models fell in the non-emitter category, four in the low category; two
in the medium category and thirteen models in the high category.
The results were verified by tests repeated in a special laboratory
chamber. The researchers tested one machine in each of the emissions
categories, Morawska said.
"In the chamber, we were able to look at the effect of the toner
and see whether the age of the cartridge made a difference. Emissions
were higher with a newer cartridge and when there was a greater density
of toner coverage," she said.
For almost two years, HP has been working with scientists to study emissions
from laser printers, company spokeswoman Emily Horn wrote in an e-mail
to The Chronicle. To date, HP hasn't been able to determine the chemical
composition of the ultra-fine particles, nor has it been able to trace
the source in the printing system, she said.
"HP believes that all laser printers emit nanoparticles to one
degree or another," Horn wrote. Emissions come from a variety of
sources in the printer, and while the number of particles emitted is
high, they're so tiny that it's difficult to collect a sample large enough
to analyze, she wrote.
Past studies have shown that photo copy machines also release tiny particles.
But in the Brisbane office building, the researchers found that the copiers
were not nearly as problematic as the laser printers, Morawska said.
Other studies that have focused on office air pollution have shown that
the pollutant ozone -- which can come into buildings from the outdoors
or be created by machines like printers or copiers -- can mix in the
air with organic substances, such as solvents in air fresheners or floor
cleaners. That mixture can create new kinds of indoor particles, such
as a formaldehyde-like chemical that enters the lungs when inhaled.
The Australian study didn't look at whether ozone contributed to the
particle emissions. HP believes that the issue of ozone is largely of
the past because of technological changes in the printers that cause
them not to emit the pollutant.
Scientists need to do more study on the human health effects of ultra-fine
particles from office equipment, said Charles J. Weschler, an indoor
air pollution expert and professor at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
and Rutgers University.
Only a few studies focus on the health effects of indoor air pollution
while damage caused by ultra-fine particles out of doors is well understood,
he said.
"We still have a great deal to learn regarding the consequences
of indoor inhalation and ultra-fine particles," Weschler said.
At the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, environmental chemists
Hugo Destaillats and Randy Maddalena praised the Australian paper and
said it pointed toward areas where future studies are needed. The two
scientists are examining how the chemical particles are produced from
laser printers and computers and what the particles are made of. They,
too, said they don't yet know the chemical composition of the toner-like
material.
Russell Marchetta, a spokesman for Ricoh Americas Corp., which has main
offices in West Caldwell, N.J., said his company is pleased that out
of five printers, four showed no emissions and one showed low emissions.
Toshiba executives did not return calls seeking comment.
This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
Airpura Chemical and VOC Carbon
Air Purifiers
Airpura has several models with carbon filters that can deal
with over 4000 chemicals and VOCs. The Airpura C600 features a 3" deep,
570 square inch surface, 26 pound carbon bed to absorb chemicals and
gases. The Airpura V600 has
a 18 pound super carbon for formaldehyde and ammonia-based chemicals.
Also, the P600 includes
UV and TitanClean photocatalyst technology for maximum purification. more
info
Want
help determining which model(s) are right for your business?
Call our Certified Air Quality Specialist at 866-875-4386 (toll free).
FREE Monthly Newsletters
We publish four FREE monthly newsletters.
To subscribe to any or all newsletters, click here: Subscribe
to Newsletters
1) Inspired
Lifestyles News for inspiring, motivating
and empowering quotes, stories and articles.
2) Healthy Lifestyles
News with
articles, tidbits, resources and products to help you
live a healthier, more vibrant life.
3) Inspired Biz News with
articles, stories and resources to create
a more spiritual, whole-living work environment.
4) InspiredLiving.com News & Sale
Announcements to hear about sales events, new products and website
upgrades.
On-Line Since 1997 • Order Toll FREE at 866-875-4386 (USA and Canada Only. All Others Call 503-537-0636
PST)